For example, tuition at the University of Southern California (USC) costs more than $60,000 a year, which the athletes get for free. It’s not entirely accurate to say the athletes make nothing. After all, the critics of amateurism complained, it’s not fair that universities and coaches make millions of dollars while the athletes that do all the work make nothing! The purpose of both rule changes was to help student athletes and make sure universities and coaches couldn’t get rich exploiting them. Aim Was to Avoid Exploitation of Athletes What if Young could earn $2 million if he transferred to Texas? This could get out of hand quickly. Now imagine players using the new transfer portal rules and the NIL deals in tandem. The Athletic reported last year that Alabama’s Bryce Young was earning nearly $1 million in NIL sponsorships before he had ever played a down. Why would a top-rated offensive linemen go anywhere else?īut $50,000 is peanuts compared to what the most coveted players are making. The schools aren’t paying the players directly, but its wealthy boosters pay players through local businesses or nonprofits.įor example, according to Sports Illustrated, all scholarship offensive linemen at the University of Texas are offered $50,000 per year to be spokesmen for the nonprofit Horns with Heart. To Kiffin’s point, these rule changes give the teams with the most money even more of an advantage than they already had. The transfer rules recently changed, allowing student-athletes to transfer once without sitting out a year, and, consequently, rosters are now much more fluid. This resulted in most student-athletes beginning and ending their college careers at the same school. The previous rule stated that when an athlete transferred to another school he or she couldn’t play for one academic year. Like the new NIL rules, changes to the transfer portal have caused some upheaval. In response to the new laws and ruling, the NCAA stopped restricting payments for NIL deals. However, NIL laws began taking effect last year in several states, requiring that student athletes be allowed to make money off their name, image, and likeness, just like professional athletes.Ī unanimous Supreme Court ruling in June 2021 also held that restrictions by the NCAA on “education-related benefits” violated antitrust law. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the governing body of college athletics, had previously banned NIL payments to student athletes in an effort to keep college sports amateur. Fisher called Kiffin and other critics “clown acts” and complained that “the guys griping about NIL and transfer portal, are using it the most. Jimbo Fisher, the head coach of Texas A&M, didn’t appreciate Kiffin’s joke.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |